After accusing her political rival Steve Poizner of undercutting Prop. 13 with support for a recent bond measure, GOP candidate Meg Whitman won the endorsement of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayer Association. These twin events show the continued importance of Prop. 13 to the California governor’s race, writes columnist Cathleen Decker in The Los Angeles Times.

Click Here to read the article.

This editorial on Sign On San Diego discusses how new state candidates will undoubtedly target Prop. 13 in their 2010 initiatives. However, as the author points out, these accusations still receive little support from voters who are already overburdened with taxes. Proponents of Prop. 13 will be hard pressed to find good reasons to remove the proposition or the tho-thirds compromise.

Click Here to read the article.

As this blurb in the Sign On San Diego News reports, critics of Proposition 13 frequently make the claim that the voters no longer support the proposition and the two-thirds requirement. However, polls once again have proved this claim to be utterly false. In fact, only a small percentage of voters wish to see legislative change in these areas.

Click Here to read the article.  Read more >>

HJTA president Jon Coupal wrote an article in the Sacramento Bee, explaining how Proposition 13 was not the start of California's plunge into debt. In fact, it is what has helped to stabilize the state's income, while property value dropped and the state's spending flailed out of control.

Click Here to read the article.

This article from the Wall Street Journal replies to the accusations that voters are somehow to blame for California's billions of dollars in debt. Legislators blame voters even though only a portion of government spending programs were locked in place by voter initiatives. Instead, the government's ever increasing spending habits on things like the labor unions (which constitute a third of the budget) are very clearly the cause of California's mountain of debt.  Read more >>