<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.hjta.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Proposition 218</title>
 <link>http://www.hjta.org/taxonomy/term/44%2C44</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Background on Proposition 218</title>
 <link>http://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-218/background-proposition-218</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Proposition 218 came to the rescue of Proposition 13.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-218/background-proposition-218&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 13:02:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmonma</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">34 at http://www.hjta.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Closing the Assessment Loophole in Proposition 13</title>
 <link>http://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-218/closing-assessment-loophole-proposition-13</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Proposition 13 could be rendered meaningless if Proposition 218 fails at the polls.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consider: Proposition 13 is a law designed chiefly to protect property taxpayers. It put limits on how high and how fast property taxes can climb and requires a vote of the people on new local taxes. After Prop 13&#039;s success, bureaucrats looked for ways to raise revenues while avoiding Prop 13&#039;s restrictions. They hit upon assessment districts, which were historically used to fund capital improvements that directly benefited property. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-218/closing-assessment-loophole-proposition-13&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/assessment">Assessment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/tax-increase">Tax Increase</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:06:24 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmonma</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">60 at http://www.hjta.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Text of Proposition 218 with Analysis</title>
 <link>http://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-218/text-proposition-218-analysis</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Right To Vote On Taxes Act&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;small&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Statement of Drafters&#039; Intent&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, January 1997&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SECTION 1. TITLE. This Act shall be known and may be cited as the &quot;Right to Vote on Taxes Act.&quot; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-218/text-proposition-218-analysis&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/assessment">Assessment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/local-taxes">Local Taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/parcel-taxes">Parcel Taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 18:15:26 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmonma</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76 at http://www.hjta.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Water Rates Under Proposition 218</title>
 <link>http://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-218/water-rates-under-proposition-218</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The September 1997 issue of &lt;em&gt;Debt Line&lt;/em&gt; reported on an Attorney General opinion which concluded that water service was not &quot;property&lt;br /&gt;
related&quot; for purposes of Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218). Such an interpretation, if adopted by the courts, would permit local governments to impose water rates in a manner that deviates from the important &quot;costs of service&quot; requirements mandated by the new law, as well as depriving California taxpayers of significant procedural protections. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-218/water-rates-under-proposition-218&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 18:28:34 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmonma</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">77 at http://www.hjta.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
