<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.hjta.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Proposition 99</title>
 <link>http://www.hjta.org/taxonomy/term/115%2C115</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Anniversary of Kelo Decision Passes With No Reforms in California</title>
 <link>http://www.hjta.org/california-commentary/anniversary-kelo-decision-passes-no-reforms-california</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Reflections on the Prop. 98 Campaign&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As the third anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Kelo v. New London&lt;/em&gt; decision came and went on June 23rd, California remains among the few states that has failed to join over 40 states in curbing eminent domain abuse. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hjta.org/california-commentary/anniversary-kelo-decision-passes-no-reforms-california&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/california-commentary">California Commentary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/eminent-domain">Eminent Domain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/kelo-case">Kelo Case</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/property-rights">Property Rights</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/proposition-98">Proposition 98</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/proposition-99">Proposition 99</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:58:52 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gforster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">147 at http://www.hjta.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>An Obscure Public Agency Has Been Funding Campaigns To Oppose Private Property Rights</title>
 <link>http://www.hjta.org/california-commentary/obscure-public-agency-has-been-funding-campaigns-oppose-private-property-right</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It turns out that the real secret behind the battle between Propositions 98 and 99 is the funding sources for the anti-property rights initiative, Prop 99. On Sunday, an &lt;em&gt;Orange County Register&lt;/em&gt; investigative news story reported how an obscure public agency has been used to divert public money into political campaign accounts to deny Californians private property rights. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hjta.org/california-commentary/obscure-public-agency-has-been-funding-campaigns-oppose-private-property-right&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/california-commentary">California Commentary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/eminent-domain">Eminent Domain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/property-rights">Property Rights</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/proposition-98">Proposition 98</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/proposition-99">Proposition 99</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:31:40 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gforster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">151 at http://www.hjta.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Independent Legal Analysis of Prop. 99 Exposes Fatal Flaws</title>
 <link>http://www.hjta.org/california-commentary/independent-legal-analysis-prop-99-exposes-fatal-flaws</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claimed Homeowner Protections Easily Circumvented&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the past several months, local government interests, including the League of California Cities and the California State Association of Counties, have spent millions of dollars touting Prop. 99 as ironclad protection for Californians who fear having their homes seized by local governments to be turned over to private developers for strip-malls and other for-profit projects. But the list of property rights experts who reject this claim is growing. This is because Prop. 99 includes significant loopholes that will allow public agencies to continue to forcibly seize owner occupied homes and give them to wealthy and politically connected developers, even if the measure wins voter approval. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hjta.org/california-commentary/independent-legal-analysis-prop-99-exposes-fatal-flaws&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/california-commentary">California Commentary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/court-cases">Court Cases</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/kelo-case">Kelo Case</category>
 <category domain="http://www.hjta.org/tags/proposition-99">Proposition 99</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:41:59 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gforster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">154 at http://www.hjta.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
