user warning: Table 'hjta_prod.cache_similarterms' doesn't exist query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire FROM cache_similarterms WHERE cid = '1:737' in /var/www/hjta.org/public_html/includes/database.mysqli.inc on line 156.
user warning: Table 'hjta_prod.cache_similarterms' doesn't exist query: LOCK TABLES cache_similarterms WRITE in /var/www/hjta.org/public_html/includes/database.mysqli.inc on line 156.
user warning: Table 'hjta_prod.cache_similarterms' doesn't exist query: UPDATE cache_similarterms SET data = 'a:3:{i:0;O:8:\"stdClass\":26:{s:3:\"nid\";s:2:\"35\";s:3:\"vid\";s:2:\"35\";s:4:\"type\";s:4:\"page\";s:6:\"status\";s:1:\"1\";s:7:\"created\";s:10:\"1232482282\";s:7:\"changed\";s:10:\"1233275451\";s:7:\"comment\";s:1:\"0\";s:7:\"promote\";s:1:\"0\";s:6:\"sticky\";s:1:\"0\";s:18:\"revision_timestamp\";s:10:\"1233275451\";s:5:\"title\";s:19:\"The History of HJTA\";s:4:\"body\";s:6911:\"Our Mission\r\nThe Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association is dedicated to the protection of Proposition 13 and the advancement of taxpayers\' rights, including the right to limited taxation, the right to vote on tax increases and the right of economical, equitable and efficient use of taxpayer dollars.\r\nThrough education and awareness, we strive to empower you, the taxpayer, to take control of your rights and influence the momentum of ballots and initiatives supportive of your rights.\r\n<div class=\"callout\">Today, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association has grown with the support of more than a quarter-million taxpayers!\r\n </div>\r\nOur beginnings\r\nAfter years of work by tax revolt leaders Howard and Estelle Jarvis, <a href=\"/propositions/proposition-13/\">Proposition 13</a> was overwhelmingly approved by voters on June 6, 1978. But Howard and Estelle knew that taxpayers\' gains would be temporary without a permanent citizens organization to protect Proposition 13 and to continue the movement against higher taxes. To meet this need, they founded the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (originally called the California Tax Reduction Movement).\r\nAlthough Howard Jarvis passed away in 1986 and his wife Estelle passed away in 2006, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association continues their important work.\r\nAnd with the constant pressure from government for higher taxes, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association\'s role as the legal and political watchdog over Proposition 13 is more important than ever.\r\nOur accomplishments\r\nWorking through the Legislature, courts, and ballot initiatives, the tax-fighting work of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association has saved Californians billions of dollars. Estimates are that Proposition 13 has saved California taxpayers over 528 billion dollars. And when you add in all of the other HJTA victories...the average California family of four has saved more than $57,000 as a direct result of the activities of Howard Jarvis and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association!\r\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" border=\"0\" width=\"506\" class=\"highlight\">\r\n<tr>\r\n<th colspan=\"2\">Estimated tax savings for California</th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"source\">From Proposition 13 alone:</td>\r\n<td class=\"savings\">$528 billion for California taxpayers</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"source\">From Proposition 13 and other HJTA victories:</td>\r\n<td class=\"savings\">over $57,000 for the California family of four</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</table>\r\n \r\nHere are just a few examples of the many successful tax-reduction campaigns led by Howard Jarvis and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association:\r\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" border=\"0\" class=\"tablelist\">\r\n<tr>\r\n<td valign=\"top\" class=\"list\"> 1978\r\n </td>\r\n<td valign=\"top\"> Howard Jarvis helped lead the campaign to pass Proposition 13, which has saved Californians an estimated $400 billion and allowed millions of Californians to keep their homes.\r\n </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td valign=\"top\" class=\"list\"> 1981\r\n </td>\r\n<td valign=\"top\"> Through our national arm, the American Tax Reduction Movement, we delivered more than one million petitions to Washington supporting President Reagan\'s 25% cut in federal income taxes.\r\n </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td valign=\"top\" class=\"list\"> 1982\r\n </td>\r\n<td valign=\"top\"> We passed Proposition 7, income tax indexing, which prevents state income taxes from being raised by inflation. Estimated tax savings: $82 billion.\r\n </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td valign=\"top\" class=\"list\"> 1986\r\n </td>\r\n<td valign=\"top\"> We passed Proposition 62, which strengthened the taxpayers\' right to vote on local tax increases.\r\n </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td valign=\"top\" class=\"list\"> 1986\r\n </td>\r\n<td valign=\"top\"> We supported Proposition 60, which will save senior citizens thousands of dollars when they retire and move.\r\n </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td valign=\"top\" class=\"list\"> 1990-92\r\n </td>\r\n<td valign=\"top\"> We led the successful legal defense of Proposition 13 against three major court challenges, including the case of Nordlinger v. Hahn, which was heard by the United States Supreme Court.\r\n </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td valign=\"top\" class=\"list\"> 1993\r\n </td>\r\n<td valign=\"top\"> We waged the campaign against Proposition 170, a ballot measure sponsored by the Legislature, which would have reduced the vote to pass local bonds and raise property taxes from two-thirds to a simple majority. Proposition 170 was voted down with 69% of the vote.\r\n </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td valign=\"top\" class=\"list\"> 1994\r\n </td>\r\n<td valign=\"top\"> We successfully campaigned against Proposition 180, which would have cost taxpayers $3.5 billion to purchase land for special interests.\r\n </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td valign=\"top\" class=\"list\"> 1996\r\n </td>\r\n<td valign=\"top\"> We sponsored and passed Proposition 218 — the Right to Vote On Taxes Act — to restore and expand taxpayer protections provided by Proposition 13.\r\n </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td valign=\"top\" class=\"list\"> 2003\r\n </td>\r\n<td valign=\"top\"> We went to court and successfully blocked an illegal $1.9 billion bond that the state was attempting to issue to cover its expenses. The taxpayers would have been obligated to repay principal and interest.\r\n </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td valign=\"top\" class=\"list\"> 2004\r\n </td>\r\n<td valign=\"top\"> We led the fight that defeated the powerful public employee union campaign behind Prop. 56 — a direct attack on Proposition 13, which would have made it way too easy to increase taxes.\r\n </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td valign=\"top\" class=\"list\"> 2006\r\n </td>\r\n<td valign=\"top\"> We led the successful campaign that defeated Prop. 88, which would have imposed a new state tax on all California property owners.\r\n </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</table>\r\n Additionally:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Recent lawsuits by HJTA have saved taxpayers nearly $4 billion.</li>\r\n<li>HJTA maintains a full-time presence in Sacramento to lobby against bills that are bad for taxpayers and to promote those that improve taxpayer protections.</li>\r\n<li>Our Political Action Committee has played an important role in the successful campaigns of those who have pledged to support Proposition 13 and hold the line on taxes.</li>\r\n<li>The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation has sponsored presidential debates, conferences on tax policy issues and numerous studies on such subjects as the impact of Proposition 13 on local government, and the benefits to state and local governments from contracting out to the private sector for certain services.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n\";s:6:\"teaser\";s:521:\"Our Mission\r\nThe Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association is dedicated to the protection of Proposition 13 and the advancement of taxpayers\' rights, including the right to limited taxation, the right to vote on tax increases and the right of economical, equitable and efficient use of taxpayer dollars.\r\nThrough education and awareness, we strive to empower you, the taxpayer, to take control of your rights and influence the momentum of ballots and initiatives supportive of your rights.\";s:3:\"log\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"format\";s:1:\"3\";s:3:\"uid\";s:1:\"3\";s:4:\"name\";s:6:\"jmonma\";s:7:\"picture\";s:0:\"\";s:4:\"data\";s:6:\"a:0:{}\";s:4:\"path\";s:23:\"about-hjta/history-hjta\";s:4:\"tags\";a:1:{i:1;a:4:{i:19;O:8:\"stdClass\":5:{s:3:\"tid\";s:2:\"19\";s:3:\"vid\";s:1:\"1\";s:4:\"name\";s:13:\"Howard Jarvis\";s:11:\"description\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"weight\";s:1:\"0\";}i:48;O:8:\"stdClass\":5:{s:3:\"tid\";s:2:\"48\";s:3:\"vid\";s:1:\"1\";s:4:\"name\";s:14:\"Proposition 13\";s:11:\"description\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"weight\";s:1:\"0\";}i:49;O:8:\"stdClass\":5:{s:3:\"tid\";s:2:\"49\";s:3:\"vid\";s:1:\"1\";s:4:\"name\";s:10:\"Tax Revolt\";s:11:\"description\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"weight\";s:1:\"0\";}i:50;O:8:\"stdClass\":5:{s:3:\"tid\";s:2:\"50\";s:3:\"vid\";s:1:\"1\";s:4:\"name\";s:11:\"Tax Savings\";s:11:\"description\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"weight\";s:1:\"0\";}}}s:22:\"last_comment_timestamp\";s:10:\"1232482327\";s:17:\"last_comment_name\";N;s:13:\"comment_count\";s:1:\"0\";s:8:\"taxonomy\";a:5:{i:72;O:8:\"stdClass\":5:{s:3:\"tid\";s:2:\"72\";s:3:\"vid\";s:1:\"6\";s:4:\"name\";s:10:\"About HJTA\";s:11:\"description\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"weight\";s:1:\"0\";}i:19;r:25;i:48;r:31;i:49;r:37;i:50;r:43;}s:10:\"page_title\";b:0;}i:1;O:8:\"stdClass\":28:{s:3:\"nid\";s:2:\"78\";s:3:\"vid\";s:2:\"78\";s:4:\"type\";s:12:\"propositions\";s:6:\"status\";s:1:\"1\";s:7:\"created\";s:10:\"1147398199\";s:7:\"changed\";s:10:\"1233279988\";s:7:\"comment\";s:1:\"0\";s:7:\"promote\";s:1:\"0\";s:6:\"sticky\";s:1:\"0\";s:18:\"revision_timestamp\";s:10:\"1233279988\";s:5:\"title\";s:28:\"Proposition 13 Savings Chart\";s:4:\"body\";s:3731:\"Estimate your tax savings by finding the year you purchased your home. \r\nThe savings amounts shown are based on the median sales price for homes in California for each year. If you bought your home for more than the statewide average, your tax savings — thanks to Proposition 13 and HJTA — are even greater. \r\n<table class=\"data-small\">\r\n<tr style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\r\n<td>Purchase Year</td>\r\n<td>Median Sales Price in Purchase Year[1]</td>\r\n<td>Average Savings Per Year</td>\r\n<td>Total Savings Since Year of Purchase[2]</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1978[3]</td>\r\n<td>$70,890</td>\r\n<td>$4,892</td>\r\n<td>$146,748</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1979</td>\r\n<td>$84,150</td>\r\n<td>$4,859</td>\r\n<td>$140,920</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1980</td>\r\n<td>$99,550</td>\r\n<td>$4,805</td>\r\n<td>$134,532</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1981</td>\r\n<td>$107,719</td>\r\n<td>$4,844</td>\r\n<td>$130,777</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1982</td>\r\n<td>$111,800</td>\r\n<td>$4,948</td>\r\n<td>$128,659</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1983</td>\r\n<td>$114,260</td>\r\n<td>$5,059</td>\r\n<td>$126,464</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1984</td>\r\n<td>$114,370</td>\r\n<td>$5,243</td>\r\n<td>$125,832</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1985</td>\r\n<td>$119,860</td>\r\n<td>$5,326</td>\r\n<td>$122,504</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1986</td>\r\n<td>$133,640</td>\r\n<td>$5,347</td>\r\n<td>$117,626</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1987</td>\r\n<td>$142,060</td>\r\n<td>$5,413</td>\r\n<td>$113,674</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1988</td>\r\n<td>$168,200</td>\r\n<td>$4,909</td>\r\n<td>$98,182</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1989</td>\r\n<td>$177,270</td>\r\n<td>$5,149</td>\r\n<td>$97,831</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1990</td>\r\n<td>$178,270</td>\r\n<td>$5,326</td>\r\n<td>$95,873</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1991</td>\r\n<td>$185,010</td>\r\n<td>$5,420</td>\r\n<td>$92,143</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1992</td>\r\n<td>$186,490</td>\r\n<td>$5,650</td>\r\n<td>$90,399</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1993</td>\r\n<td>$188,240</td>\r\n<td>$5,958</td>\r\n<td>$89,375</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1994</td>\r\n<td>$193,770</td>\r\n<td>$6,245</td>\r\n<td>$87,435</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1995</td>\r\n<td>$196,120</td>\r\n<td>$6,617</td>\r\n<td>$85,951</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1996</td>\r\n<td>$197,030</td>\r\n<td>$6,973</td>\r\n<td>$83,673</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1997</td>\r\n<td>$200,490</td>\r\n<td>$7,374</td>\r\n<td>$81,115</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1998</td>\r\n<td>$200,660</td>\r\n<td>$7,598</td>\r\n<td>$75,980</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1999</td>\r\n<td>$221,520</td>\r\n<td>$7,903</td>\r\n<td>$71,131</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>2000</td>\r\n<td>$243,390</td>\r\n<td>$8,276</td>\r\n<td>$66,204</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>2001</td>\r\n<td>$265,480</td>\r\n<td>$8,687</td>\r\n<td>$60,806</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>2002</td>\r\n<td>$333,240</td>\r\n<td>$8,795</td>\r\n<td>$52,780</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>2003</td>\r\n<td>$371,520</td>\r\n<td>$9,208</td>\r\n<td>$46,041</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>2004</td>\r\n<td>$450,990</td>\r\n<td>$9,167</td>\r\n<td>$36,668</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>2005</td>\r\n<td>$548,430</td>\r\n<td>$8,915</td>\r\n<td>$26,745</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>2006</td>\r\n<td>$567,690</td>\r\n<td>$9,000</td>\r\n<td>$17,999</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>2007</td>\r\n<td>$558,100</td>\r\n<td>$8,929</td>\r\n<td>$8,929</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</table>\r\n \r\n[1] SOURCE: California Association of REALTORS® \r\n[2] Tax savings calculation compares the estimated tax paid under Proposition 13 with the tax that would have been paid if Prop. 13 had not been enacted. The tax rate in place when Proposition 13 passed was an average of 2.6%. (In some counties, the rate was much higher.) \r\n[3] Tax savings listed assumes the home was purchased prior to the passage of Prop. 13. For homes purchased in 1978 after Prop. 13 took effect, the estimated total savings is $157,094 for a yearly average of $5,237. \r\n\r\n\";s:6:\"teaser\";s:334:\"Estimate your tax savings by finding the year you purchased your home. \r\nThe savings amounts shown are based on the median sales price for homes in California for each year. If you bought your home for more than the statewide average, your tax savings — thanks to Proposition 13 and HJTA — are even greater. \";s:3:\"log\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"format\";s:1:\"3\";s:3:\"uid\";s:1:\"3\";s:4:\"name\";s:6:\"jmonma\";s:7:\"picture\";s:0:\"\";s:4:\"data\";s:6:\"a:0:{}\";s:4:\"path\";s:56:\"propositions/proposition-13/proposition-13-savings-chart\";s:12:\"field_byline\";a:1:{i:0;a:1:{s:5:\"value\";s:0:\"\";}}s:22:\"field_featured_content\";a:1:{i:0;a:1:{s:5:\"value\";s:2:\"no\";}}s:4:\"tags\";a:1:{i:1;a:2:{i:48;O:8:\"stdClass\":5:{s:3:\"tid\";s:2:\"48\";s:3:\"vid\";s:1:\"1\";s:4:\"name\";s:14:\"Proposition 13\";s:11:\"description\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"weight\";s:1:\"0\";}i:50;O:8:\"stdClass\":5:{s:3:\"tid\";s:2:\"50\";s:3:\"vid\";s:1:\"1\";s:4:\"name\";s:11:\"Tax Savings\";s:11:\"description\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"weight\";s:1:\"0\";}}}s:22:\"last_comment_timestamp\";s:10:\"1233279861\";s:17:\"last_comment_name\";N;s:13:\"comment_count\";s:1:\"0\";s:8:\"taxonomy\";a:3:{i:43;O:8:\"stdClass\":5:{s:3:\"tid\";s:2:\"43\";s:3:\"vid\";s:1:\"5\";s:4:\"name\";s:14:\"Proposition 13\";s:11:\"description\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"weight\";s:3:\"-10\";}i:48;r:93;i:50;r:99;}s:10:\"page_title\";b:0;}i:2;O:8:\"stdClass\":28:{s:3:\"nid\";s:4:\"1142\";s:3:\"vid\";s:4:\"1142\";s:4:\"type\";s:10:\"news_story\";s:6:\"status\";s:1:\"1\";s:7:\"created\";s:10:\"1267561031\";s:7:\"changed\";s:10:\"1267561183\";s:7:\"comment\";s:1:\"0\";s:7:\"promote\";s:1:\"0\";s:6:\"sticky\";s:1:\"0\";s:18:\"revision_timestamp\";s:10:\"1267561183\";s:5:\"title\";s:59:\"ARTICLE: Proposition 13 a Major Factor in Governor’s Race\";s:4:\"body\";s:518:\"After accusing her political rival Steve Poizner of undercutting Prop. 13 with support for a recent bond measure, GOP candidate Meg Whitman won the endorsement of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayer Association. These twin events show the continued importance of Prop. 13 to the California governor’s race, writes columnist Cathleen Decker in The Los Angeles Times.\r\n<a href= \"http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-week28-2010feb28,0,3797464.story\" target=\"_blank\">Click Here</a> to read the article.\";s:6:\"teaser\";s:518:\"After accusing her political rival Steve Poizner of undercutting Prop. 13 with support for a recent bond measure, GOP candidate Meg Whitman won the endorsement of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayer Association. These twin events show the continued importance of Prop. 13 to the California governor’s race, writes columnist Cathleen Decker in The Los Angeles Times.\r\n<a href= \"http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-week28-2010feb28,0,3797464.story\" target=\"_blank\">Click Here</a> to read the article.\";s:3:\"log\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"format\";s:1:\"3\";s:3:\"uid\";s:2:\"10\";s:4:\"name\";s:5:\"tgaul\";s:7:\"picture\";s:0:\"\";s:4:\"data\";s:111:\"a:4:{s:7:\"contact\";i:1;s:17:\"mimemail_textonly\";i:0;s:14:\"picture_delete\";s:0:\"\";s:14:\"picture_upload\";s:0:\"\";}\";s:4:\"path\";s:56:\"news/article-proposition-13-major-factor-governor-s-race\";s:12:\"field_byline\";a:1:{i:0;a:1:{s:5:\"value\";s:0:\"\";}}s:22:\"field_featured_content\";a:1:{i:0;a:1:{s:5:\"value\";s:2:\"no\";}}s:4:\"tags\";a:1:{i:1;a:2:{i:165;O:8:\"stdClass\":5:{s:3:\"tid\";s:3:\"165\";s:3:\"vid\";s:1:\"1\";s:4:\"name\";s:13:\"Governor 2010\";s:11:\"description\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"weight\";s:1:\"0\";}i:48;O:8:\"stdClass\":5:{s:3:\"tid\";s:2:\"48\";s:3:\"vid\";s:1:\"1\";s:4:\"name\";s:14:\"Proposition 13\";s:11:\"description\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"weight\";s:1:\"0\";}}}s:22:\"last_comment_timestamp\";s:10:\"1267561183\";s:17:\"last_comment_name\";N;s:13:\"comment_count\";s:1:\"0\";s:8:\"taxonomy\";a:3:{i:5;O:8:\"stdClass\":5:{s:3:\"tid\";s:1:\"5\";s:3:\"vid\";s:1:\"2\";s:4:\"name\";s:4:\"News\";s:11:\"description\";s:4:\"News\";s:6:\"weight\";s:1:\"0\";}i:165;r:147;i:48;r:153;}s:10:\"page_title\";b:0;}}', created = 1269263875, expire = 1269267475, headers = '' WHERE cid = '1:737' in /var/www/hjta.org/public_html/includes/database.mysqli.inc on line 156.

ARTICLE: Prop. 13 is Not the Problem

July 9, 2009

This article in the Los Angeles Times was written by Joel Fox, former president of HJTA. Fox shows how accusations against Proposition 13 almost always flare up around times of economic struggle. However, the facts show that Proposition 13 is still very popular and valuable to California’s well-being.

Click Here to read the article.